Legal Opinion
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. Jim Whiteside, and Philip Brendale, Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. County of Yakima
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 21, 1987No. 85-4316PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
828 F.2d 529
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Jim WHITESIDE, et al., Defendants,
and
Philip Brendale, Defendant-Appellant.
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF YAKIMA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 85-4316, 85-4433 and 85-4383.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1986.
Decided Sept. 21, 1987.
James B. Hovis, Yakima, Washington, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Charles C. Flower, Jeffrey C. Sullivan, David A. Thompson, and Patrick Andreotti, Yakima, Washington, for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BRENDALE v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Governing Council of Pinoleville Indian Community v. Mendocino CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
- BRENDALE v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- BRENDALE v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989