Legal Opinion

Lacy v. Wozencraft

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1940No. 29579PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the superior court rendered on a verdict for plaintiff in a forcible entry and detainer action.

Defendant complains of certain of the court’s instructions relating to the statute of frauds and estoppel to assert the same in connection with the question of the validity of an alleged oral lease contract.

Defendant had occupied plaintiff’s premises under a written lease contract for a term of three years. After the expiration thereof defendant continued to occupy the premises for a period of one year, during which time, according to defendant’s evidence, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flesner v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Boese v. ChildressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Johnston v. BaldockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Riser v. HerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. McMonigle v. PoorhorseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Brown v. Founders Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Peoples National Bank v. Linebarger Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Central Heat, Inc. v. Daily Olympian, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Apex Siding & Roofing Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API