Legal Opinion
Kellam v. Brode
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1905No. 18PublishedCited by 1 opinion
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment and order denying a new trial.
The complaint was filed March 19, 1902, declaring upon a promissory note, payable to plaintiff and signed by defendants, dated June 15, 1899, due in one year, for twelve hundred dollars, with interest at seven per cent per annum payable semi-annually. Upon the note appeared the following indorsements:—
“Six months int. paid on within note; $42.00. M. Y. Kellam.
“March 19, 1900. Paid Two Hundred Dollars on within note. M. Y. Kellam.
“March 19, 1900. Int. paid in advance, $140.00; amount for two years from date. M. Y. Kellam.-”
In an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Skelly v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Woodburn v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Hellier v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Knight v. BentelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919