Cape Charles Bank, Inc. v. Farmers Mutual Exchange, Inc.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Northampton county, in an action of debt. Judgment for the defendants. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
Upon the merits of the case the defendants rely upon subdivision 6 of sub-section 120 of section 2841 of the negotiable instruments law, Pollard’s Code of Va. 1904, which provides with respect to what will release parties secondarily liable on negotiable instruments, as follows: That such parties will be released—
“By any agreement binding upon the holder to extend the time of payment or to postpone the holder’s right to enforce the instrument, unless made with the assent of the party secondarily liable or unless the right of recourse against such party is expressly reserved.”
This rule was the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skelly v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Hosea v. RowleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Oberndorff v. Union BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Haydenville Savings Bank v. ParsonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Bank of British Columbia v. JeffsWashington Supreme Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harris v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- North Bank v. Circle Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Commercial Savings Bank of Carroll v. DunningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Lee Federal Credit Union v. Warnetta M. Gussie v. Susan T. Lee and Kwang W. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Bradford v. Union Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.