Legal Opinion
"Doe" v. "Roe"
New York Family Court
Decided March 11, 1963PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph E. Dyer, J.
The petitioner has moved this court for an order vacating the respondent’s notice to examine the petitioner before trial.
The proceeding is one which seeks to establish the paternity of a male child born to petitioner, out of wedlock, on March 12, 1963 at Flower Fifth Avenue Hospital, New York City. This proceeding was commenced by the filing of a verified petition on January 28, 1963, and issue was joined on February 8, 1963, when the respondent appeared in person and by counsel, denied the allegations of the petition and moved for. a blood-grouping *149test. On March 1, 1963, the respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Denton v. DentonNew York Family Court · 1942
- Immerman v. ImmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Appelbaum v. AppelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1913
- In re WurtzelSullivan County Children's Court · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schwartz v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Tilson v. BarkNew York City Family Court · 1966
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Otilio O.New York Family Court · 1972
- Hirsch v. HirschNew York City Family Court · 1967
- Green v. SmithNew York Family Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.