Legal Opinion
Tilson v. Bark
New York City Family Court
Decided November 21, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Doran, J.
This is a proceeding to determine paternity and for support of a child born out of wedlock (Family Ct. Act, § 511 et seq.).
The respondent herein moves for a general and unlimited examination of the petitioner before trial under the provisions of the CPLR that authorize a ‘1 full disclosure of all evidence material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action, regardless of the burden of proof” (CPLR 3101). An action includes a special proceeding of the kind at bar (see Matter of Anonymous v. Anonymous, 48 Misc 2d 949, 950), wherein leave of court is required for disclosure (CPLR…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commissioner of Public Welfare v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- "Doe" v. "Roe"New York Family Court · 1963
- Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1965
- Appelbaum v. AppelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Bayne v. WillardNew York City Family Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arlene W. v. Robert D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Linnie D. B. v. Lonnie J. H.New York Family Court · 1970
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Otilio O.New York Family Court · 1972
- Green v. SmithNew York Family Court · 1970
- Maureen E. O'H. v. Nicholas C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.