Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Hirsch

New York City Family Court

Decided May 26, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrie Slifkin, J.

In this support proceeding, under article 4 of the Family Court Act, the petitioner has served upon respondent a notice of examination before trial relating to the finances of the respondent. A copy of this notice has not been furnished to the court.

A motion has been made by the respondent under CPLR 3103 for a protective order denying petitioner the examination sought.

At the hearing conducted before the court, statements of the respondent and the financial information furnished by the parties established that respondent was employed ón a weekly basis, that this salary was his sole source of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. "Doe" v. "Roe"New York Family Court · 1963
  2. Kasden v. KasdenNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Fred S.New York Family Court · 1971
  2. Green v. BrownNew York Family Court · 1970
  3. Fine v. FineNew York City Family Court · 1970
  4. Martin v. MartinNew York City Family Court · 1972
  5. De Raffele v. De RaffeleNew York Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API