Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to vacate an order for the examination of the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegebich, J.

The only matters which, by her affidavit, the plaintiff shows that she expects to establish by the examination of the defendant before trial are the acts of adultery charged against him in the complaint and the amount of his property and income. Although the defendant is privileged as to the first ground, this does not constitute a valid reason for denying the plaintiff’s right to the order for his examination, since the privilege is a personal one and may not be insisted upon. At all events, the question should be reserved until the examination occurs and can then be disposed of by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Valkenburgh v. Van ValkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Ryan v. ReaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Danziger v. DanzigerNew York Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. "Doe" v. "Roe"New York Family Court · 1963
  2. Jasne v. JasneNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Whittaker v. WhittakerNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kellogg v. Match Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API