Legal Opinion

In re Wurtzel

Sullivan County Children's Court

Decided September 30, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.

Respondent moves for an order ‘ ‘ striking out the affidavit and petition of Mollie Wilinsky herein by reason of her failure to attend in response to the notice for her examination or in the alternative for an order directing her to attend for an examination before trial in accordance with such notice.” The notice for the examination served on behalf of defendant is stated to be ‘£ pursuant to Article 29 of the Civil Practice Act and Title 15 of the Rules of Civil Practice.”

A filiation proceeding initiated in a Children’s Court, pursuant to the Domestic Relations Law, is civil and noncriminal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of ClausiNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Denton v. DentonNew York Family Court · 1942
  3. Commissioner of Welfare v. SotoNew York Court of Special Session · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. "Doe" v. "Roe"New York Family Court · 1963
  2. Maureen E. O'H. v. Nicholas C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API