Legal Opinion
Martin v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 3, 2003No. CIV.A.02-851 RMCPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
George A. Martin applied for a position as a part-time bus driver with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) on February 2, 2002. His application was initially denied and he was accepted in June 2002 only after he protested. He sues for alleged irregularities in the hiring process that deprived him of approximately 14 weeks of work as a bus driver. Pending before the Court is WMATA’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Beebe v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Houston Business Journal, Inc. And Dee Gill, Individually v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Howell v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- In the Matter of the FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF the EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lizzi v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Battles v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Darian McKinney v. DCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.