Legal Opinion
Battles v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1655PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Sheldon Battles, proceeding pro se, has sued defendants Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMA-TA”) and two of its employees — Summon Cannon and Devin Walker (together, “Individual Defendants”) — for breach of contract, wrongful termination in violation-of public policy, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) ■ and 12(b)(6).…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Battles v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Goldstein v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Lemke-Vega v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Rae v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- SILVERBERG v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.