In the Matter of the FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF the EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
This action was instituted on behalf of individuals who were killed or injured in a collision between two Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMA-TA”) trains that occurred on June 22, 2009, near WMATA’s Fort Totten Metro-rail station. Currently before the Court are the following seven contested dispositive motions: (1) WMATA’s motion to dismiss Alstom Signaling, Inc.’s (“Alstom”) statute of repose affirmative defense, ECF No. 353; 2 (2) Ansaldo STS USA, Inc.’s (“Ansaldo”) motion for judgment on Counts 7, 11, and 15 of…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Beach TV Props., Inc. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Cabalce v. VSE Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- In Re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Beach TV Props., Inc. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Kubicki ex rel. Kubicki v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.