Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF the EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 5, 2012No. Misc. No. 2010-0314PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.

This action was instituted on behalf of individuals who were killed or injured in a collision between two Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMA-TA”) trains that occurred on June 22, 2009, near WMATA’s Fort Totten Metro-rail station. Currently before the Court are the following seven contested dispositive motions: (1) WMATA’s motion to dismiss Alstom Signaling, Inc.’s (“Alstom”) statute of repose affirmative defense, ECF No. 353; 2 (2) Ansaldo STS USA, Inc.’s (“Ansaldo”) motion for judgment on Counts 7, 11, and 15 of…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Beach TV Props., Inc. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Cabalce v. VSE Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  3. In Re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Beach TV Props., Inc. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Kubicki ex rel. Kubicki v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API