Legal Opinion

Patton v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided April 21, 2005No. TC 4621PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant (the department). Plaintiff (taxpayer) objected to the department’s motion, asserting that material issues of fact are present in the case that prevent summary judgment. Taxpayer has also advanced legal arguments in opposition to those of the department. The tax years at issue are 1998 and 1999.

II. FACTS

Either through uncontroverted assertions made by the department or taxpayer or matters stipulated before or at the hearing on this case, 1 the following material…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dimeo v. GesikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Schellin v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
  2. Webb v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
  3. Webb v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2006
  4. Department of Revenue v. WheelerOregon Tax Court · 2005
  5. Newton v. Clackamas County AssessorOregon Tax Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API