Patton v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant (the department). Plaintiff (taxpayer) objected to the department’s motion, asserting that material issues of fact are present in the case that prevent summary judgment. Taxpayer has also advanced legal arguments in opposition to those of the department. The tax years at issue are 1998 and 1999.
II. FACTS
Either through uncontroverted assertions made by the department or taxpayer or matters stipulated before or at the hearing on this case, 1 the following material…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Dimeo v. GesikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Schellin v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Webb v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
- Webb v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2006
- Department of Revenue v. WheelerOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Newton v. Clackamas County AssessorOregon Tax Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.