Ammerman v. Karnowski
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
There are 35 assignments of error in the petition in error, but there is no effort to follow them seriatim in the briefs. Their discussion here will be comprehended by the answers to the following questions:
1. Was there such an acceptance of the deed by defendant as relieved plaintiff from the obligation of his contract to convey a “clear title of record”?
2. If not, did tlie abstract furnished show a clear title of record?
3.- Were any of the instructions of the court to which exceptions were taken, prej-udicially erroneous?
4. Are the verdict and judgment sustained by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Sockey v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Pyeatt v. EstusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Dosar v. HummellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dill v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Rock Island Implement Co. v. PearseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Tull v. MilliganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Koutsky v. Park Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Miller v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.