Sockey v. Winstock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Brror from District Court, Carter County; Stillwell H. Russell, Judge. Action by Maggie Sockey and others, through their guardian, Chas. H. Victor, against R. M. Winstock and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.
Plaintiffs in en;or, Maggie Sockey, Rafe Sockey, and Ned Sockey, through their guardian, Chas. H. Victor, brought this action in the court below against defendants in error to have declared void and of no effect a conveyance of certain lands belonging to said plaintiffs, which conveyance was made by their former guardian, J. Mat Moore, to defendant I. H. Winstock. Plaintiffs allege in their petition that said sale was void, and conveyed no title to I. PI. Winstock, defendant, who was the purchaser at said sale, and that R. M. Winstock, who afterwards purchased from I. H. Winstock, took the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Morrill v. MorrillOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Allison v. CrummeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Griffin v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.