Legal Opinion
Tull v. Milligan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 9, 1935No. 24670PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs in error were defendants, and the defendant in error was plaintiff, in the trial court. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the lower court.
About August 1, 1929, the defendant Tull, ' acting through his agents, the defendants W. N. Courtney and R. D. Courtney, partners, doing business under the name Courtney & Son, entered into negotiations with the plaintiff, Milligan, for the sale to the latter of 160' acres of farm land. These negotiations resulted in a meeting of the contracting parties in the office of Courtney & Son at Anadarko, where a contract in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Snyder v. StriblingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Big Jack Mining Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Producers' Oil Co. v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- M.-K.-T. R. Co. v. EmbreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wray v. FerrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hart v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hawkins v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939