Legal Opinion
Rogers v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1935No. Civ. No. 9535PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff Billie Eileen Rogers and the other plaintiffs, her parents, recovered judgment against defendants for injuries received by the first-named plaintiff, then twenty years of age, when the coupe driven by her was struck by an ambulance owned by defendant city and driven by defendant Garrett in the course of his employment. Defendants appeal.
The accident occurred about noon on a clear day. The driver of the coupe was going east on Jefferson Boulevard in the City of Los Angeles, and as she approached the intersection of Crenshaw Boulevard the signal was open for east…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Keena v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Armas v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Tuten v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Lucas v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Raynor v. City of ArcataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Washington v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Isaacs v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.