Legal Opinion
Fahy v. Fahy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 31, 1993No. 14647PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiff, Richard A. Fahy, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the defendant, Thelma Ann Fahy, for an increase in her periodic alimony. The plaintiff claims that the trial court: (1) incorrectly concluded that Public Acts 1990, No. 90-213, § 462 (P.A. 90-213, § 46), permits the modification of an award of periodic alimony made prior to October 1, 1987, the effective date of Public Acts 1987, No. 87-1043 (P.A. 87-104), without *507proof by the moving party of a substantial change in circumstances that was not contemplated at the time of the dissolution of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.