Gadbois v. Planning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs in this case, Mary Gadbois, Robert Gadbois and Lucy Romanych (plaintiffs)1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the granting of a subdivision application by the named defendant, the planning commission of the town of East Lyme (commission).2 They claim that the trial court improperly determined that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal owing to their failure to comply with the strict requirements of General Statutes § 8-8.3 We affirm the trial court’s judgment of dismissal.
*606The following facts are pertinent to…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
4Cited by11 opinions
- Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Connor v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Nine State Street, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- R.C. Equity Group, LLC v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Kindl v. Department of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.