Nine State Street, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the fifteen day statutory period for commencing a zoning appeal may be extended when the fifteenth day falls on a legal holiday. The plaintiff, Nine State Street, LLC, *44appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing its zoning appeal from the named defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the city of Bridgeport (commission),2 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that its zoning appeal was untimely because service of process had not been made within the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Norwich Land Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Matthiessen v. VanechSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Tayco Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.