Legal Opinion
Stanley Industries, Inc. v. WM Barr & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided February 11, 1992No. 89-1840-CIVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MORENO, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon defendant W.M. Barr & Co.’s Motion for Summary Judgment in this matter involving claims of negligence, strict liability and breach of warranty against a manufacturer and retailer 1 of an alleged inherently dangerous product. Having reviewed the written pleadings and deposition testimony submitted and considering the legal arguments presented by the parties, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied in accordance with the following order.
I.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Impossible Electronics Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Lighting Fixture and Electric Supply Co. Inc. v. The Continental Insurance Co., and Electric Supply Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Brunswick Corporation v. Harold VinebergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ugaz v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Pinchinat v. Graco Children's Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Town of Bridport v. Sterling Clark Lurton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In Re Fosamax Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Martinez v. Triad Controls, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.