Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Triad Controls, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 2009No. Civil Action 05-4534PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAUFFMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Fernando and Lucy Martinez brought this action against Defendants Triad Controls, Inc. (“Triad”); Ingersoll Rand, Ingersoll-Rand Canada, Inc., and Canada Machinery Corporation, Ltd. (collectively “Ingersoll-Rand”); 1 Northern Machinery, Inc.; Francis A. Blake; and E.W. Bliss Company, alleging strict liability, negligence, and loss of consortium. 2 Now before the Court are the Motions for Summary Judgment of Defendants Triad and Ingersoll-Rand. For the reasons that follow, the Motions will be granted in part and denied in part.

I.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beam v. McNeilus Truck & Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
  2. Betancourth v. KnorrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Brown v. PeruginoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. GAMBLE v. PETERBILT MOTORS CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Jones v. BooneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API