Legal Opinion
Brunswick Corporation v. Harold Vineberg
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1967No. 22907PublishedCited by 175 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
The initial transaction in this cause of action took place in the halcyon days of the bowling business. On April 11,1961, Sky Bowl, Inc., (“Bowl”), a Florida corporation, admittedly controlled by defendants Vineberg and DeMet, Florida residents, entered into a conditional sales contract with Brunswick Corporation, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois, for the purchase of 32 bowling lanes and accessories. At the same time Bowl entered into a similar conditional sales contract with Brunswick Automatic Pinsetter Corporation for the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Reese v. HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- William L. Tippens, Deceased, Nell P. Tippens, Individually and as Widow of William L. Tippens v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.