Legal Opinion

Hawk v. Mayer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1950No. 31361PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was instituted by twenty-four plaintiffs pursuant to the uniform declaratory judgment act of the state of Washington, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), §§ 784-1 to 784-17 [P.P.C. §§65-1 to 65-33], inclusive, for the purpose of seeking adjudication as to their rights and status arising out of certain contracts, both oral and written, entered into with the defendants. In the prayer of their complaint plaintiffs prayed for coercive relief in addition to declarative relief.

Defendants filed an answer denying the principal allegations of the complaint and affirmatively alleging facts creating an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Conaway v. Time Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Peoples Park & Amusement Ass'n v. AnrooneyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Paine-Gallucci, Inc. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Skidmore v. Pacific Creditors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Pedersen v. KlinkertWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Watson v. Washington Preferred Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kahin v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Reeder v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API