Legal Opinion

Pedersen v. Klinkert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1960No. 35057PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

— This is an appeal by a defendant from an order denying a motion to vacate a default judgment, the trial court having heard evidence in support of the allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint and having made and .entered its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment.

The appellants are proceeding, as they must under RCW 4.72.010, et seq., the time for an appeal having expired. Under this statute the superior court has power to vacate or modify a final judgment it has entered:

“(3) For mistakes, neglect or omission of the clerk, or irregularity in obtaining a judgment or order.
“(4) For…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. De YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Paine-Gallucci, Inc. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hawk v. MayerWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Skidmore v. Pacific Creditors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bishop v. IllmanWashington Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Otis Housing Ass'n v. HaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Otis Housing Ass'n, Inc. v. HaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lake Washington School District No. 414 v. Mobile Modules Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API