Legal Opinion

Watson v. Washington Preferred Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1972No. 42367PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeill, J.

This appeal challenges the constitutionality of our “missing shareholder” statute, RCW 23A.08.305, and, alternatively, questions the sufficiency of proof required for the initiation and approval of a proceeding thereunder.

Pursuant to a plan of merger of Washington Preferred Life Insurance Company and Northern National Life Insurance Company, Washington Preferred called a shareholders’ meeting to consider and vote upon the proposed merger. Notice of the meeting was mailed to shareholders of record, stating in part:

A special meeting of the stockholders of Washington Preferred Life Insurance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ware v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Parr v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. Human Relations Research FoundationWashington Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Figueroa Ferrer v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
  2. Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rivett v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Soundgarden v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Standow v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API