Legal Opinion

Bernard v. First Nat. Bank of Claremore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1927No. 17514PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

The First National Bank of Claremore, as plaintiff, sued ‘K. D. Bernard and Ruby Bernard upon a note for the principal sum of $3,500 and for the foreclosure of a mortgage to secure the same. Suit was also brought against K. D. Bernard upon a note for the principal sum of $1,500. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The defendants admitted the execution and delivery of the notes and mortgage, but alleged they received only $1¡,650 as a consideration for the $3,500 note and there was no consideration for the $1,500 note.. They confessed judgment for the sum…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Elling v. Bank of JeffersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Oilton State Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bartels v. SuterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Golden Glow Ref. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Mitchell v. Fayette Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API