Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank v. Golden Glow Ref. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 3, 1930No. 19326PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEACH, C.
The First National Bank of Tulsa commenced this action in the district court of Tulsa county against the Golden Glow Refining Company and J. A. Boyd to recover a balance alleged to be due on a promissory note executed by the Golden Glow Refining Company ahd indorsed by J. A. Boyd, W. A. Moore, and J. M. Chandler.
No defense was made by the refining company and judgment was entered against it by default.
The defendant Boyd pleaded as a defense to the action that the note and his indorsement thereon were made without consideration and for the accommodation of the plaintiff bank.
Upon a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oilton State Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Lindsay State Bank v. ForbisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wilhoit v. SeavallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Bartels v. SuterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Bernard v. First Nat. Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bence v. Teddy's TaxiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hogue v. McClain County Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Harris v. SnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967