Legal Opinion

Gormley v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7244PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— The appellant was the plaintiff below. The-circuit court sustained a demurrer to the third paragraph of the original complaint, and also sustained a demurrer to the; evidence adduced by the plaintiff. .

It is not necessary to give a transcript or summary of the-bill of exceptions. The point made upon the evidence may be considered and decided upon the following statement of the case, taken from the brief for appellant:

“Statement op the case.

‘ ‘ The appellant is the administrator of the estate of Patrick Canfield, deceased. Canfield was killed on the 30th day of June, 1875, in Martin county,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railway Co. v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. TindallIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Columbus & Indianapolis Central Railway Co. v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Slattery's Administrator v. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Gillenwater v. Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Huey v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. McMullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API