Gormley v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Martin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
— The appellant was the plaintiff below. The-circuit court sustained a demurrer to the third paragraph of the original complaint, and also sustained a demurrer to the; evidence adduced by the plaintiff. .
It is not necessary to give a transcript or summary of the-bill of exceptions. The point made upon the evidence may be considered and decided upon the following statement of the case, taken from the brief for appellant:
“Statement op the case.
‘ ‘ The appellant is the administrator of the estate of Patrick Canfield, deceased. Canfield was killed on the 30th day of June, 1875, in Martin county,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railway Co. v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. TindallIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Columbus & Indianapolis Central Railway Co. v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Slattery's Administrator v. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Gillenwater v. Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Huey v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. McMullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.