Legal Opinion

Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. Tindall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 56 opinions

APPEAL from the Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by Margaretta Tindall, mother of Daniel Tindall, deceased, a minor, against the Ohio and Mississippi Railroad Company, to recover damages for the loss of the life of said Daniel, he having been killed by an engine of said company, running upon the road.

The general denial was pleaded, upon which the cause was tried, and the plaintiff had j'udgment for 2,000 dollars.

' The facts in the case are these:

A set of hands were at work for the Ohio ahd Mississippi Railroad Company, gravelling a portion of the track. The gravel was conveyed from the pit to the place where it was used upon the road,…

2Cited by56 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hyatt v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. HAHN v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API