Legal Opinion
United States v. Leslie Roy Jordan and Ronald Bernard Croft
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1990No. 88-1175, 88-1219PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
The sole issue presented in each of these appeals is whether the appellants were tried within the limitations of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. (1988). Appellants Leslie Roy Jordan and Ronald Bernard Croft appeal from their convictions for narcotic offenses. 1 The appellants were tried together, and the material facts with respect to the Speedy Trial issue are the same for both.
The appellants were originally charged in a massive indictment with 31 other co-defendants. The indictment was returned June 12, 1986. The Speedy Trial Act commands that a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Michael Lawrence PollockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Mildred CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Pedro Perez-RevelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gale Gordon FreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Santiago-BecerrilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Larry Darnell Westbrook, Wayne Allen Bledsoe, Jr., Michael Lynn Peoples, and A.J. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Bruce Derek Spring AKA Bruce Derek WallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Raoul Barrie ClymerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Joseph M. PalombaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.