Legal Opinion
United States v. Gale Gordon Frey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1984No. 83-5150PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Frey appeals his conviction for conspiring to receive goods stolen from interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. He contends the government failed to bring him to trial within the seventy-day period provided for by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174 (the Act). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We conclude that Frey was tried in violation of the Act, and reverse and remand.
I
A Maryland grand jury indicted Frey on June 2, 1981. His arraignment in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland on June 16 triggered the running…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Mildred CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Alphonso Brooks, in No. 82-1265, and United States of America v. Charles Reed, A/K/A Bouloud Charles Reed, in No. 82-1270Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Vernon Edwards, United States of America v. Robert E. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. David Collins CliffordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. Alan N. ScottCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Peter NooneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Raoul Barrie ClymerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James Tunnessen, Douglas Fullerton, and Michael Robert Reape, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.