Legal Opinion
United States v. Raoul Barrie Clymer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1994No. 91-50326PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT.
Before: REINHARDT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN, * District Judge. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Once again, we are called upon to review a conviction obtained by the government as a result of its four-year sting operation at the Triple Neck Scientific company in Kearny Mesa, California. See, e.g., United States v. Bruce, 976 F.2d 552 (9th Cir.1992); United States v. Nichols, 956 F.2d 276 (9th Cir.1992) (table); United States v. Allen, 955 F.2d 630 (9th Cir.1992) (per curian). In exchange for an agreement by the owner of Triple Neck to provide the DEA with…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. Thomas GambinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Clarence Kenneth GormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. StaulaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Bradley GEORGE, AKA: Steve Eugene Johnson, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Rick K. VoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.