Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph M. Palomba
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1994No. 93-10061PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
On October 22,1990, Appellant Joseph Pa-lomba (Palomba) was convicted of mail fraud, wire fraud and making false statements to a federal agency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343 and 1001. He was sentenced to 71 months imprisonment and three years supervised release. Palomba challenges his conviction on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel and the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction or venue.
Palomba contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed (i) to argue that the district court lacked subject…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Joseph M. PalombaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jose M. Quintero-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Sidney J. Dickler, Richard R. Petrucci. Sidney J. Dickler, in No. 94-3517. Richard R. Petrucci, in No. 94-3518Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.