Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. MSAS Cargo International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 18, 1998No. C 98-0370 SIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING ASIANA AIRLINES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On October 30, 1998, the Court heard argument on defendant Asiana Mrlines, Inc.’s (“Asiana’s”) motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Having carefully considered the moving and opposing papers and the arguments of counsel, and for the reasons set out below, Asiana’s motion is hereby GRANTED, based both on the applicable limitations period as set forth by Article 29 of the Warsaw Convention 1 and on the notice of claim requirements in Article 26 of the Warsaw Convention.
BACKGROUND
This action…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allan Campbell v. Air Jamaica LTDCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- McCaskey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Chubb Insurance Co. of Europe S.A. v. Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Pennington v. British AirwaysDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003