Legal Opinion

Pennington v. British Airways

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 2003No. CIV.A.02-7125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Dennis and Mary Lou Pennington have brought this action against British Airways to recover for injuries that Mr. Pennington allegedly sustained on July 13, 2000 as a result of not receiving appropriate medical treatment from British Airways personnel after he suffered a severe stroke during an international flight. Before the court is British Airways’ motion to dismiss the case as time barred.

British Airways contends that the instant action, commenced by the plaintiff by writ of summons in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas on July 15,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan TsengSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. FloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Zicherman Ex Rel. Estate of Kole v. Korean Air Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allan Campbell v. Air Jamaica LTDCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Narayanan Ex Rel. Narayanan v. British AirwaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Narayanan Ex Rel. Narayanan v. British AirwaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. QBE Insurance v. Eya Airways Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API