Legal Opinion
McCaskey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 17, 2001No. CIV A G-00-572PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENT, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this lawsuit based upon the October 10, 1998 death of her husband, which followed a stroke he suffered on September 24, 1998. Now before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Continental Airlines, Inc. (“Continental”), Defendant Erik Moerman (“Captain Moerman”), Defendant Gordon Bethune (“Bethune”) and Defendant MedAire, Inc. (“MedAire”). 1 For the reasons stated below, Continental’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Leitch v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Olympic Airways v. HusainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blansett v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Cover Note B0753PC1308275000 v. Expeditors Korea Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Dictor v. David & Simon, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Safa v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktienge-Sellschaft, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.