Legal Opinion
G.D. Searle & Co. v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 23, 2003No. C 02-00089 SBAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Federal Express Corporation’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. 24] and Defendant Union Transportation GMBH’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. 29]. Having read and considered the arguments presented by the parties in the papers submitted to the Court, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. The Court hereby DENIES Federal Express Corporation’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and DENIES Union Transportation GMBH’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Federal Express Corporation, a Corporation, Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Federal Express Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Polanski v. KLM Royal Dutch AirlinesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Continental Insurance v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.