Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & Pagos

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2007No. 46A05-0602-CV-94PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issues

Norman R. Carlson, Jr., individually, and as executor of the estates of Norman R. Carlson and Hilda D. Carlson, and as Trustee of the Trust established under the last wills and testaments of Norman Sr. and Hilda, Margaret Ann Carlson, Beth Carlson Montigue, and David R. Carlson, (when referred to collectively, the “Carl-sons”), filed a complaint against the law firm of Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes and Pagos, and lawyer John H. Sweeney (the “Lawyers”), alleging legal malpractice that resulted in adverse tax consequences. The Lawyers filed…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Jewett v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ickes v. WatersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Kern v. RadezDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009
  5. Tyris D. Lapsley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API