Legal Opinion
Ickes v. Waters
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 22, 2008No. 90A02-0703-CV-287PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Pansy M. Ickes alleges Gregory K. Waters failed to exercise ordinary skill and knowledge in counseling her and preparing her estate plan. Pansy appeals from summary judgment for Waters. We affirm, finding the trial court properly concluded the statute of limitations had run.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Raymond and Pansy Ickes had lived together as husband and wife since 1953. 1 They did not have any children together. Pansy had two children from a previous relationship: Randall Brown and Jerry Brown. Raymond also had two children from a previous marriage: Diana Odom and Jerry…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Bernstein v. GlavinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Biomet, Inc. v. Barnes & ThornburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elaine Chenore v. Robert PlantzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Ickes v. WatersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- RUCKELSHAUS v. COWANDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019