Legal Opinion
Kern v. Radez
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 25, 2009No. Case 1:07-cv-1529-DFH-TABPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
DAVID F. HAMILTON, Chief Judge.
Attorney William Radez Jr. made a serious mistake in preparing trust documents for his clients Ted Holland and his wife Barbara DeMasie Holland. The person who will be harmed by the mistake is plaintiff Ann Kern, Ted Holland’s daughter by a previous marriage. The people who will benefit from the mistake are Barbara’s five children by a previous marriage.
Plaintiff Kern brought this diversity action to recover damages from attorney Radez for his mistake. Radez chose not to answer the complaint. Default has been entered against…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mike Yang v. Paul HardinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Muriel D. Black v. Michael P. Lane, Michael Neal, P.A. Severs, CaptainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Salvatore Di Mucci, Robert Di Mucci and Anthony Di MucciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Knierim v. United States Government Department of the NavyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011