Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1940No. 210PublishedCited by 759 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

We took this case because it raises an important question as to the construction of the Revenue Act of 1926, § 302 (f), amended by the Revenue Act of 1932, § 803 (b).

The question is to what extent and in what sense the law of the decedent’s domicile' governs in determining whether a power of appointment exercised by him is a general power within the meaning of the statute.

The petitioner is the executor of Elizabeth S. Morgan who was the donee of two powers of appointment over property held in two trusts created by her father- by will and by deed. The persons named are, or were, at death,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by759 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Helvering v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

754 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API