Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & Pagos

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 2007No. 46A05-0602-CV-94PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

ROBB, Judge.

Norman R. Carlson, Jr., individually, and as executor of the estates of Norman R. Carlson and Hilda D. Carlson, and as Trustee of the Trust established under the last wills and testaments of Norman Sr. and Hilda, Margaret Ann Carlson, Beth Carlson Montigue, and David R. Carlson, (when referred to collectively, the “Carl-sons”), filed a complaint- against the law firm of Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes and Pagos, and lawyer John H. Sweeney (the “Lawyers”), alleging legal malpractice that resulted in adverse tax consequences. The trial court granted the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kenworth of Indianapolis, Inc. v. Seventy-Seven LimitedIndiana Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API