Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Rohnke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 30, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant had been working for the employer for 24 years in various positions when he was discharged for his involvement in the planning and/or implementation of the electronic surveillance of models who were appearing on a morning television talk show that claimant directed. A technical director for the show testified that it was claimant’s idea to place…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Di Maria v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Claim of PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In Re the Claim of PunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re the Claim of MarkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of BernetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of GrimardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of GarnicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of BrownscheidleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of RiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999