Legal Opinion
Di Maria v. Ross
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1980PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated.
The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was not employed by Crown Tex Corporation and, ■thus, had failed to terminate his prior disqualification from receiving benefits caused by his discharge due to misconduct. (See Labor Law, § 593, subd 3.) In so finding, the board rejected testimony offered by claimant, his wife who was a bookkeeper at Crown Tex, and Gerald David, the assistant secretary of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Avon Bar & Grill, Inc. v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by115 opinions
- Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ribya BB. v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- 677 New Loudon Corp. v. State of New York Tax Appeals TribunalNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re the Claim of FalcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.