Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Markowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Main, J.
Claimant had worked for approximately 15 years as a budget and fiscal analyst for the Human Resources Administration of the City of New York when he was discharged effective April 29, 1981. The duties that his position entailed included reviewing and developing budget proposals, formulating policies and procedures for funding of community programs and monitoring grants and expenditures by his agency. His termination was a consequence of certain incidents which led to his being indicted, pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 201 of title 18 of the United States…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zazycki v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by14 opinions
- Matter of Sinker (Sweeney)New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re the Claim of BruggemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Poore v. City of MindenNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- In re the Claim of CarylAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of McCallumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.