Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Boys

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1919No. 9,790PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Grant Superior Court; Robert M. Vcm Atta, Judge. Action by Clifford C. Boys against tbe Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff; the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

— The appellee’s complaint is in two paragraphs. In the first it is alleged that appellant is a corporation engaged in the operation of a railroad passing through Gas City and Upland; that appellee purchased a ticket from appellant’s agent at Gas City entitling him to be carried from Gas City to Upland; that he took passage on a train leaving Gas City at 2:17 a. m., scheduled and advertised to stop at Upland on flag to take on and discharge passengers. It is then averred: “That as said train approached the station at- Upland, it began to slow down, and that he, the plaintiff, believing that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PinchinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. England v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western & Southern Life Insurance v. LottesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API