Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Crunk

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1889No. 13,337PublishedCited by 56 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Olds, J. —

This is an action by the appellee against the appellant for damages resulting from injuries to the appellee by reason of the negligence of appellant’s employees in failing to stop a passenger train at a railway station a sufficient length of time to allow appellee to get off in safety, and in suddenly accelerating the speed of the train when appellee ■was in the act of stepping off.

As some question is made as to the negligence charged in the complaint, we state the principal averments, which are as follows : That the defendant, before and at the time of the grievances complained of,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. H.M. Filer v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Town of Albion v. HetrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. RowanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. WalbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. PhippsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Suber v. Georgia, Carolina & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API