Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. Carper

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1887No. 12,826PublishedCited by 36 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee alleges that his intestate bought a ticket at Connersville entitling him to a passage on the defendant’s trains to Cincinnati, Ohio; that his intestate was a stranger in Connersville, unacquainted with the points of the compass at that city; that on the day he purchased his ticket he went to the appellant’s depot, intending to take passage on its east-bound train, which, according to schedule time, passed Connersville at eight o’clock and forty-seven minutes p. M. ; that the east and west-bound trains usually passed at that hour at Connersville; that the night on…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. H.M. Filer v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Gaynor v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API