Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. Ford
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from he. Flore County Court; James h. Hale, Judge. Action by A. J. Ford against the Ft. Smith & Western Railroad .Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
Defendant in error, plaintiff below, recovered judgment in the county court of Le Flore county against the plaintiff in error,' defendant below, for damages occasioned by the negligence of defendant in carrying the plaintiff, who was a passenger on one of its trains, through a station to which he had purchased a ticket on defendant company’s line of railroad. The verdict was for $75. Nine specifications of error are assigned by the plaintiff in error, but two of which are discussed in the brief. The first is that, the action being one for a breach of contract, there was no…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brown v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Head v. Georgia Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Heirn v. M'CaughanMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
- Memphis &. Charleston R. R. v. WhitfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Thyssen, Inc. v. S.S. Fortune Star, Her Engines, Boiler, Etc., Evolution Maritime Enterprises, Ltd., and Taiwan International Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Morriss v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Jackson v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Herron v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.